Prime News Ghana

BOST slapped with GH₵9.9m judgment debt

By PrimeNewsGhana
BOST slapped with judgement debt
BOST slapped with judgement debt
Shares
facebook sharing button Share
twitter sharing button Tweet
email sharing button Email
sharethis sharing button Share

An Accra High Court has ordered Bulk Oil and Storage and Transportation (BOST) to pay a total of GHS 9,962, 118.84 to Hask Oil Company Limited.

The amount, according to the court, is the interest accrued on a bank facility Hask Oil took while their products were in the custody of BOST.

BOST, the Defendant, was punished by the court because it refused to release the plaintiff's petroleum products for sale to repay the credit facility.

The court further directed that interest at the rate of 30% per annum being the default rate being charged by the facility bank on the above sum from February 28, 2011, till the date of final payment.

The court's judgement was given by Justice Emmanuel Ankamah.

The plaintiff said that in July 2013, it stored its imported petroleum products in Defendant's storage tanks.

It said the products were financed with a credit facility from Fidelity Bank, whose terms included among others, a default interest rate of 30 per cent per annum and an execution of a lien or right to set off over a fixed deposit investment with the cedi equivalent of $2 million belonging to one J.K Horgle, the majority stakeholder of the Plaintiff company.

This was in an event that the plaintiff defaults in the repayment of the facility.

It said on 27th October 2014, when Fidelity Bank wrote to the plaintiff demanding the payment of the credit facility, the plaintiff on 31st October through its solicitors, wrote to Defendant and demanded the payment of the value of the outstanding products with interests thereon.

It said they also drew the attention of Defendant to the credit facility with Fidelity Bank.

The court said in response to their letter dated 31st October same year, the Defendant wrote to the Plaintiff on November 24, 2014, in which it acknowledged receipt but stated that it was unable to confirm the amount it owed the Plaintiff until it has ended its audit.

The products were eventually released to Plaintiff in May 2016 at the time the interest had risen to the above figure of which the plaintiff sued.